Comparison
Telegram Premium vs Olymptradе
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @premiumrussia | @zerodha |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 2.8M | 98,173 |
| Avg views | 7.3M | 134,069 |
| Engagement rate | 262.7% | 136.6% |
| 30-day growth | +1.7% | -3.2% |
| Language | Русский | Русский |
| Category | — | finance |
| Channel age | — | 1395 days |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@premiumrussia
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
@zerodha
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.