Comparison
عبارات اقتباسات ستوريات ᓭི༏ᓯྀ vs Place
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @nlnnn | @placemed |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 2.1M | 1.1M |
| Avg views | 124,000 | 73,209 |
| Engagement rate | 5.8% | 6.7% |
| 30-day growth | +3.4% | +10.7% |
| Language | العربية | Русский |
| Category | finance | — |
| Channel age | — | — |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@nlnnn
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
@placemed
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.