Comparison
Моя Москва vs Тренды моей ленты
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @moscowmi | @trendu |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 0 | 2.8M |
| Avg views | 97,824 | 27,028 |
| Engagement rate | — | 1.0% |
| 30-day growth | +18.4% | +13.9% |
| Language | Русский | Русский |
| Category | — | — |
| Channel age | — | — |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@moscowmi
Not enough data
- Not enough history yet for a full assessment
@trendu
Mixed signals
- Views are low relative to subscribers — possibly an inactive or inflated audience
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.