Comparison
Москва сегодня vs Тачки и Точка
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @moscow | @tachki |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 2.7M | 4.1M |
| Avg views | 97,399 | 43,323 |
| Engagement rate | 3.6% | 1.1% |
| 30-day growth | +0.0% | +12.9% |
| Language | Русский | Русский |
| Category | — | auto |
| Channel age | — | — |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@moscow
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
@tachki
Questionable
- Views are low relative to subscribers — possibly an inactive or inflated audience
- Engagement swings sharply between snapshots — unstable reach
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.