Comparison
ربات چت ناشناس ملوگپ vs rusich_army
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @melogapm | @rusich_army |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 2.3M | 11,318 |
| Avg views | 6.2M | 83,400 |
| Engagement rate | 264.8% | 736.9% |
| 30-day growth | +6.9% | -5.4% |
| Language | فارسی | English |
| Category | — | — |
| Channel age | 2720 days | 26 days |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@melogapm
Mixed signals
- Engagement swings sharply between snapshots — unstable reach
@rusich_army
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.