Comparison
ربات چت ناشناس ملوگپ vs پشتیبان موزیک
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @melogapm | @myrimixam |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 2.6M | 14,981 |
| Avg views | 6.4M | 48,275 |
| Engagement rate | 246.8% | 322.2% |
| 30-day growth | +11.9% | — |
| Language | فارسی | فارسی |
| Category | — | — |
| Channel age | 2799 days | 1202 days |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@melogapm
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
@myrimixam
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.