Comparison
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @melbet_gift | @zzzzzz |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 1.3M | 2M |
| Avg views | 105,040 | 130,686 |
| Engagement rate | 8.2% | 6.6% |
| 30-day growth | -3.5% | +20.9% |
| Language | العربية | العربية |
| Category | — | — |
| Channel age | 1804 days | 2197 days |
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@melbet_gift
Questionable
@zzzzzz
Looks reliable
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.