Comparison
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @melbet_gift | @sfxauusd1 |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 1.3M | 1.8M |
| Avg views | 95,736 | 126,284 |
| Engagement rate | 7.4% | 7.2% |
| 30-day growth | +0.5% | +61.3% |
| Language | العربية | العربية |
| Category | — | gambling |
| Channel age | 1796 days | 1010 days |
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@melbet_gift
Questionable
@sfxauusd1
Looks reliable
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.