Comparison
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @lotus365bookid | @rabotamoskvag |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 99,732 | 14,228 |
| Avg views | 8,122 | 1,138 |
| Engagement rate | 8.1% | 8.0% |
| 30-day growth | — | — |
| Language | English | Русский |
| Category | — | — |
| Channel age | 423 days | 186 days |
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@lotus365bookid
Looks reliable
@rabotamoskvag
Looks reliable
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.