Comparison
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @leomatchglobal | @scalpchi |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 2.5M | 15,247 |
| Avg views | 9M | 49,579 |
| Engagement rate | 362.6% | 325.2% |
| 30-day growth | +2.8% | — |
| Language | English | فارسی |
| Category | — | — |
| Channel age | 1086 days | 594 days |
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@leomatchglobal
Mixed signals
@scalpchi
Looks reliable
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.