Comparison
Endy vs CPNS INDONESIA
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @kompas | @tocpns |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 1M | 1M |
| Avg views | — | 81,085 |
| Engagement rate | 0.0% | 8.0% |
| 30-day growth | +0.0% | — |
| Language | Bahasa Indonesia | Bahasa Indonesia |
| Category | news | — |
| Channel age | — | 2446 days |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@kompas
Not enough data
- Not enough history yet for a full assessment
@tocpns
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.