Comparison
交易所盘|秒合约盘|交割合约|加密货币|永续合约|发售币|质押挖矿| vs 新闻曝光-美加墨世界杯
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @jiaoyisuo0117 | @wan8013 |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 12,939 | 16,745 |
| Avg views | 11,937 | 10,490 |
| Engagement rate | 92.3% | 62.6% |
| 30-day growth | — | — |
| Language | 中文 | 中文 |
| Category | crypto | — |
| Channel age | 247 days | 1552 days |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@jiaoyisuo0117
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
@wan8013
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.