Comparison
. vs Telegram Premium
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @ish_bor_vakansiya_toshkent_kerak | @premiumrussia |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 9,887 | 2.7M |
| Avg views | 98,226 | 7.1M |
| Engagement rate | 993.5% | 260.6% |
| 30-day growth | +5.6% | +2.4% |
| Language | Русский | Русский |
| Category | — | — |
| Channel age | 1237 days | 1327 days |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@ish_bor_vakansiya_toshkent_kerak
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
@premiumrussia
Mixed signals
- Engagement swings sharply between snapshots — unstable reach
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.