Comparison
Proxy MTProto | پروکسی vs Trade Nobody
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @iproxy | @trade_nobody |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 7.4M | 3.2M |
| Avg views | 666,262 | 18,717 |
| Engagement rate | 9.0% | 0.6% |
| 30-day growth | +0.0% | +0.0% |
| Language | فارسی | English |
| Category | — | crypto |
| Channel age | 2952 days | — |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@iproxy
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
@trade_nobody
Mixed signals
- Views are low relative to subscribers — possibly an inactive or inflated audience
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.