Comparison
Proxy MTProto | پروکسی vs iRo Proxy | پروکسی
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @iproxy | @iroproxy |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 7.3M | 7.5M |
| Avg views | 580,786 | 602,942 |
| Engagement rate | 8.0% | 8.0% |
| 30-day growth | +0.0% | +7.3% |
| Language | فارسی | فارسی |
| Category | — | — |
| Channel age | 2840 days | 2504 days |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@iproxy
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
@iroproxy
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.