Comparison
ربات دانلودر از اینستاگرام یوتیوب vs ربات چت ناشناس ملوگپ
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @instapico | @melogapm |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 1.8M | 2.6M |
| Avg views | 4.3M | 6.4M |
| Engagement rate | 234.6% | 246.8% |
| 30-day growth | +0.0% | +11.9% |
| Language | — | فارسی |
| Category | — | — |
| Channel age | — | 2799 days |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@instapico
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
@melogapm
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.