Comparison
HOT Updates vs Vidogram
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @hotonnear | @vidogram |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 4.3M | 2.2M |
| Avg views | 343,970 | 3.6M |
| Engagement rate | 8.0% | 160.9% |
| 30-day growth | -13.2% | -3.1% |
| Language | English | English |
| Category | finance | retail |
| Channel age | — | 2672 days |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@hotonnear
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
@vidogram
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.