Comparison
قیمتلحظهای دلار طلا خودرو و سکه vs شریف | Sharif
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @do_l4 | @ecoshariff |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 3.9M | 3.1M |
| Avg views | 22,947 | 231,785 |
| Engagement rate | 0.6% | 7.6% |
| 30-day growth | +75.2% | +204.6% |
| Language | فارسی | فارسی |
| Category | — | — |
| Channel age | 1259 days | 2407 days |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@do_l4
Mixed signals
- Views are low relative to subscribers — possibly an inactive or inflated audience
@ecoshariff
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.