Comparison
CRIPTO DEFI BRASIL π§π· vs π’π MAHADEV BOOK ππ’ reddyCRYPTO
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels β audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
CRIPTO DEFI BRASIL π§π·@criptodefibrasillancamentosπ’π MAHADEV BOOK ππ’ reddyCRYPTO@crypto_book_lotus365_nitinnj
| Metric | @criptodefibrasillancamentos | @crypto_book_lotus365_nitinnj |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 2,038 | 962,753 |
| Avg views | 129,837 | 84,670 |
| Engagement rate | 6370.8% | 8.8% |
| 30-day growth | β | +0.0% |
| Language | PortuguΓͺs | PortuguΓͺs |
| Category | crypto | crypto |
| Channel age | β | 566 days |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics β we have no admin access to Telegramβs native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@criptodefibrasillancamentos
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
@crypto_book_lotus365_nitinnj
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict β see the methodology.

