Comparison
Clayton vs Труха⚡️Україна
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @clayton | @truexanewsua |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 5.6M | 3.2M |
| Avg views | 642,703 | 590,920 |
| Engagement rate | 11.4% | 18.7% |
| 30-day growth | -2.0% | +1.4% |
| Language | English | Українська |
| Category | — | — |
| Channel age | — | 2474 days |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@clayton
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
@truexanewsua
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.