Comparison
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @cats_housewtf | @tomarket_ai |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 8.7M | 7.3M |
| Avg views | 186,634 | 337,138 |
| Engagement rate | 2.1% | 4.6% |
| 30-day growth | -22.1% | -21.6% |
| Language | English | English |
| Category | — | — |
| Channel age | 758 days | 783 days |
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@cats_housewtf
Looks reliable
@tomarket_ai
Looks reliable
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.