Comparison
Catapult Extreme vs Tomarket Announcement
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @catapult_extreme | @tomarket_ai |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 9.5M | 7.4M |
| Avg views | 54,065 | 336,759 |
| Engagement rate | 0.6% | 4.5% |
| 30-day growth | -19.1% | -19.9% |
| Language | English | English |
| Category | — | — |
| Channel age | 1158 days | 774 days |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@catapult_extreme
Mixed signals
- Views are low relative to subscribers — possibly an inactive or inflated audience
@tomarket_ai
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.