Comparison
Blum: All Crypto – One App vs memeficlub
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @blumcrypto | @memeficlub |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 16.2M | 1,162 |
| Avg views | 190,120 | 968,731 |
| Engagement rate | 1.2% | 83367.6% |
| 30-day growth | -19.1% | +0.0% |
| Language | English | 中文 |
| Category | crypto | gaming |
| Channel age | 923 days | 138 days |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@blumcrypto
Mixed signals
- Views are low relative to subscribers — possibly an inactive or inflated audience
@memeficlub
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.