Comparison
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @blumcrypto | @hamster_kombat |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 16.2M | 22.6M |
| Avg views | 190,120 | 4.1M |
| Engagement rate | 1.2% | 18.3% |
| 30-day growth | -18.9% | -17.4% |
| Language | English | English |
| Category | crypto | — |
| Channel age | 923 days | 875 days |
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@blumcrypto
Mixed signals
@hamster_kombat
Looks reliable
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.