Comparison
Кровавая барыня vs TrendWatching
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @bloodysx | @trendwatching24 |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 1.2M | 1.5M |
| Avg views | 92,698 | 85,268 |
| Engagement rate | 8.0% | 5.8% |
| 30-day growth | +0.9% | +35.9% |
| Language | Русский | Русский |
| Category | — | news |
| Channel age | 2881 days | 2472 days |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@bloodysx
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
@trendwatching24
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.