Comparison
Anurag Dwivedi 🏏 vs Maths By Aditya Ranjan - (Vidyagram) 🇮🇳
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
Anurag Dwivedi 🏏@anuragxcricketVerifiedMaths By Aditya Ranjan - (Vidyagram) 🇮🇳@mathsbyadityaranjan_vidyagram
| Metric | @anuragxcricket | @mathsbyadityaranjan_vidyagram |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 1.9M | 2M |
| Avg views | 2.1M | 183,257 |
| Engagement rate | 108.4% | 9.0% |
| 30-day growth | -12.6% | -0.6% |
| Language | English | हिन्दी |
| Category | gambling | retail |
| Channel age | 2069 days | — |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@anuragxcricket
Mixed signals
- Engagement swings sharply between snapshots — unstable reach
@mathsbyadityaranjan_vidyagram
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.