Comparison
Anurag Dwivedi 🏏 vs Clayton
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @anuragxcricket | @clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 1.9M | 4.6M |
| Avg views | 2.1M | 643,469 |
| Engagement rate | 108.4% | 14.1% |
| 30-day growth | -12.6% | -19.1% |
| Language | English | English |
| Category | gambling | — |
| Channel age | 2069 days | — |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@anuragxcricket
Mixed signals
- Engagement swings sharply between snapshots — unstable reach
@clayton
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.