Comparison
Airdrop Finder vs DANYEL INFOS
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @airdropfindteam | @danyelinfos |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 2.2M | 1.4M |
| Avg views | 300,000 | 128,179 |
| Engagement rate | 13.7% | 9.3% |
| 30-day growth | -12.2% | -23.6% |
| Language | Français | Français |
| Category | crypto | — |
| Channel age | — | 1151 days |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@airdropfindteam
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
@danyelinfos
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.