Comparison
Tofan Trade | سیگنال کریپتو vs Proxy MTProto | پروکسی
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @tofan_trade | @iproxy |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 0 | 7.4M |
| Avg views | 120,130 | 847,319 |
| Engagement rate | — | 11.5% |
| 30-day growth | +56.7% | +0.5% |
| Language | فارسی | فارسی |
| Category | crypto | — |
| Channel age | — | 2938 days |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@tofan_trade
Not enough data
- Not enough history yet for a full assessment
@iproxy
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.